Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/12/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Being a student, my leica kit has been built up from older
lenses found around the shops here in Edinburgh. UK prices
are not cheap compared to US but I got the lot for ~1050UKP
which seemed very reasonable, (I could have spent the same
on a decent M2 and a newer 50/2.
M4-2 slight ding beside hotshoe otherwise unmarked
90/4 (1957)
35/2 (1957)
50/2 (1957)
My question concerns first, these optics are old (Is it fate
I got matching dates from different shops?) but in good
condition, are there any particular differences (eg
noticeable on a b&w 8*10) between these and recent optics
and secondly the 50/2 has a slight mark on the element
behind the aperture blades which can only be seen if held
close to a naked bulb. The repairer said it was caused by
the aperture blades sticking at one point and bending o
touch the surface, producing the circular, very slightly
hazy mark. Have any other luggers had this problem and did
it affect the performance of the lens? The 50/2 has the most
amazing 'bokeh' with out of focus areas looking almost
ghostly, like a fine mist is in the air. Finally, does
anyone have a Noctilux I can borrow for the year...I'm
having strange dreams about big apertures...or is this a
symptom of something more serious?
Andrew
######
hiding behind a tree (it's windy)
######