Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My question was : where is the truth ? Leica says (but it's normal), Laney says (Leica lens practice, 2nd edition, p.188), Eastland says (M-compendium, p.62) that the optical performance of the tele-elmar 135 is "recognized as one of the best in the entire Leica system". The french review "Chasseur d'images" has tested the lens with MTF and concluded that the old optical formula(since 1965, no apo-element)gives only "good" (3 stars) results. BTH these tests have never been criticized by the manufacturers. They are made scientifically as Leica and others do. My opinion is that these 2 books (Laney and Eastland)are pure propaganda without any ounce of critical vision. Dominique