Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>I'm with David Vestal. I'd rather be called a "photographer" than an "artist" any day. --Mike - ----------------------------------------------------- Mike, I'm as much a purist as you are, but I do recognize art in a fine print when I see it. Whether that art is produced by a PJ or ad photographer or a field photographer, something about it makes it an esthetic experience. As you might recall, the original business of the painter was portraiture for the elite as much as decoration. But painters grew in their profession and found the range of art. That was inevitable as sensibility and craft developed. Photographers are no different. Just as a prose writer might suddenly wander off into poetry, so do work-a-day photographers sometimes stray from a subject into its essence -- and come up with an extraordinary work. I call that print art. You can call it what you will. But it's there anyway and will always remain. Since I don't have a chance to read everything on LUG, please address any replies off-list. Bob