Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] A question about the R4 vs. the R5
From: Mark Kronquist <mak@teleport.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 19:32:48 +0000

I too have not had problems with an R4 under a million six and a number of
R3's (or RE R6 or R5's SL's and SL2's either)

though my R4 looks rather the worse for wear due to extensive travel...it
works like a trooper
- ----------
> From: FIGLIO4CAP@aol.com 
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us 
> Subject: Re: [Leica] A question about the R4 vs. the R5 
> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 19:53:45 EDT 
> 
>I have owned two original Leicaflexes, three SL's, two R3's, two R4's, and
one
>R6. I still have one Leicaflex, two SL's, two R3's , one R4 and the R6 plus
an
>M3 and M6. I have never had any problems with any of these cameras. Not
even
>one! Maybe I have been lucky, but the gear has been absolutely reliable
>through trips to the Carribean, Europe and all around the US. I never
>experienced the problems mentioned here with the R3's nor R4's.
>Bob
>