Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dear Ted, Jim & Walter, All of your comments are appreciated and I believe if you read the "tone" of my original post I was not complaining about the specs but "asking" about the specs. You will also read that I was concerned more for Leica's longevity because of their quality control problems than I was about my lense. My point about all of this is that it was LEICA who told be those specs shouldn't be there. It was LEICA who told me that they will gladly clean them out. But it was Ted and Jim that jumped down my throat as if I wasn't "up to the standards" of a good Leica soldier. BS. I love my Leica lenses, do not use filters and DID NOT send my lense back. You might want to consider reading a post before you get on your soap boxes. You also might want to re-think your blind trust in anyone. I agree that the bottom line is the quality of the images that the lense/photographer takes. But I also think that any company that markets itself as "highest quality" should stand behind the slogan and not use it instead as an easy way to sell cameras/lenses. I love my Leica "stuff". I don't love receiving something in a condition below what it is advertised to be and more importantly what it should be. We are all Leica quality control reps and we better take our jobs seriously or there won't be a Leica in 5-10 years.