Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/01/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think you have it the wrong way around: With a slow lens on a rangefinder you can get the same results (or better) as with a fast lens on an SLR. (Less vibration, shake free, viewfinder is not affected by the speed of the lens). A neighbour here (The Living Tripod, fi you are old enough in NY you might know who I am talking about) showed me pictures taken in an airplane, flying, at 1/8sec very sharp. Also have depth of field!!! Also, for the ones who haven't noticed it yet, the longest lens for M mount is 135mm. And you have to be very careful when focusing that one. You don't want to shoot it wide open without having perfect focus. Not the fastest camera system for tele. Don't start any threads about Visoflex now. It is dead and buried. The fact that some of us are lusting for a Noctilux doesn't change this. I had the Noctilux till mid 97 ane wasn't that crazy about it as you seem to be. Not for my type of photo. And some of you shoot 3200ASA film with 50/1!!! and you push it!!!! What a joke! Let's get back to shooting pictures! Maybe there is a chance for us! Lucian On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 FIGLIO4CAP@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 1/19/99 12:32:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, > ewelch@ponyexpress.net writes: > > << A rangefinder cries out for fast lenses. >> > That's what the M camera is all about in my opinion. I use the R system for > every thing else. > Bob >