Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Eric, I think the others have done a good job of defending themselves. Not one indicated in "black & white" or color that they compared the Canon 400mm to the Leica 400mm. There is also 2 version of the Canon 400mm, so which was it, old or new? I was just commenting, you are now the one shooting your mouth off to defend others and gain brownie points. Peter K > ---------- > From: Eric Welch[SMTP:ewelch@ponyexpress.net] > Reply To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 2:43 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] long lens tests > > At 10:45 AM 2/19/99 -0800, you wrote: > >Not difficult, just speaking the truth. > > Not quite. Those two guys have used both the lenses in question. Ted was > forced to use Canon lenses for a while as a part of a job. And yet you > pretend you weren't shooting off your mouth (er, fingers) out of turn, and > > claiming they weren't the ones you referring to.It's right there in black > and white that you meant at least them. Otherwise you should have noted > that fact. > > Humor has it's place, but you have to learn to communicate in this medium > in a way that gets it across. It's too easy to mistake subtle humor for a > serious comment without the normal person-to-person hints, such as body > language and tone of voice. > > Eric Welch > St. Joseph, MO > http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch > > Politics: Poli (many) - tics (blood sucking parasites) >