Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dr. Black Tape Responds: The outfit you suggest will meet the needs you outline. But don't you mean 50 f2? > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Matthews > Brian > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 10:31 AM > To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > Subject: RE: [Leica] Last minute advice > > > If I had it to do again I would have saved the $$ and passed on the Leica > purchases. I find I use my F4 and H-blad systems much more. Reason? The > rangerfinder-viewfinder of the Leica is cluttered, no DOF > preview,and AF is > something I use a lot. While the Leica is a precision instrument to be > admired, it stays in the cabinet most of the time. And while the Leica > prints are considerably more detailed, I get better content with the F4 > because it frees me to concentrate. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Timothy J. Kamke [mailto:TJKamke@doralusa.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 10:02 AM > To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > Subject: [Leica] Last minute advice > > > I have been losing sleep over a possible (imminent?) Leica purchase; new > M6TTL and new 50 f/1.8. I've been a long-time Nikon user and > will continue > to be. Just wanting to; 1) refresh my photography with a more thoughtful > system (meaning that I will be more thoughtful when making photos > as opposed > to pointing and shooting with an F5), 2) have a camera with me at > ALL TIMES, > and 3) enjoy the experience of using the Leica for what it is, > and isn't. > I have been reading the LUG for about two months and enjoy it. Three > questions; Have any of you felt remorse over spending this kind > of cash on a > Leica outfit (I'm looking at $3000 U.S.), and if so, why? Will > my proposed > set-up meet my 3 needs outlined above? Should I buy it at B&H, Chatterton > or where? > Thanks in advance for your comments. > Tim Kamke >