Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Leopold, I suspect that what you have written here, along with a few other people's comments would make a fine 'BACKCHAT' for A.P., that piece inside the back cover where someone writes for half a page... Why not submit it? It could help to redress the balance. E-mail address is amateurphotographer@ipc.co.uk good luck, Jem > -----Original Message----- > From: Leopold Green [SMTP:ldg@dmu.ac.uk] > > > I agree with the point that Britain has declined in relative affluence, > however, as in all societies this isn't equally divided, there remains a > sufficient proportion of UK society capable of affording Leica, or Aston > Martin, or various 'up market' HiFi's [KEF and the like]. Leica UK seem to > sell reasonably well. I also agree that it is fine for other SLR's to beat > the R8, BUT if it is done fairly. This test wasn't fair! Neither was their > test last year when they placed the M6 last against the G2 and XPAN. The > point I really wanted to make is that AP completely ignores Leica's lens > selection, and after all a camera body is, no matter how good it is, > something you mount a piece of glass on. When people are thinking of > buying > a camera system, even a 'high end one' they may well look at magazines > like > AP and what AP said this week, like what it said last year in the > rangefinder test, is hardly likely to encourage someone to take the plunge > and spend several grand. It would be fairer to if they could say that > Leica > is very expensive, isn't, in the Minolta/Canon scheme of things, good > value > for money BUT does offer unrivalled quality within the 35mm sector. > > I think AP is out of step with its English audience anyway, last year they > did a readers poll of the greatest camera ever and the M6 came joint top > with the F2M. > > Leopold > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stuart Phillips [mailto:stuart.phillips@umb.edu] > Sent: 22 July 1999 00:08 > To: leica-users-digest@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > <mailto:leica-users-digest@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Subject: [Leica] Amateur Photographer and R8 > > > It seems that there is a definite cultural difference operating here. As > usual, what is the "best"? I am English by birth but have more than 20 > years' distance to improve my perspective. > > Since World War II, Britain has until recently been significantly less > affluent. Magazines and other media reflect this, in part by considering > value for money, or if you like, the possibly of any of their readers ever > owning the product. In the US, cereal ads take place in $50,000 kitchens. > In > Britain, a cleaning product is demonstrated in a kitchen like mine (only > cleaner). In SLR's Leica doesn't get the free ride that the M system does > through lack of competition. (BTW, I love M's) It doesn't seem so > surprising that another SLR would beat out the R8. > > stuart phillips