Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 35mm Summilux
From: "Guido Soprano" <guidosoprano@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 01:50:20 EDT

Pre-Asph sucks wide open (with slow film) at the sides (ameriKan edges).

So, who cares?

Guido


>From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
>Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: Re: [Leica] 35mm Summilux
>Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 06:30:42 -0400
>
>Someone posted negative comments about the 35 Summilux?   I have both the
>old pre-aspheric and the first version aspheric, and they are both great
>lenses.  And the 2nd version aspheric is universally regarded as a great 
>lens.
>
>So I can't see on what basis you may be questioning your purchase.
>
>Dan C.
>
>  At 02:22 AM 11-08-99 EDT, you wrote:
> >Well, guys!  I went ahead and bought the Leica 35mm Summilux.  After
> >listening to the comments on the list, I wonder if I made the right 
>decision.
> >
> >Skip
> >
> >
>
>NO ARCHIVE
>
>
>


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com