Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Welcome back! Wondered where you had disappeared to. Let's have another LUG dinner in Hong Kong. Eh? Jim Nelon Cummer Family wrote: > > Dear Luggers, > I have been off the LUG for seven weeks travelling in England and Scotland > and then North America with my newish M6HM TTL along with 35 summicron > Asph, 24mm ASPH, 90 Elmarit and the Voigtlander 15mm Heliar plus a Metz > 32ZM2 all tucked away in a Domke bag. I used mostly the 35, followed by the > Heliar, with only a few times when the 24 seemed just right. The 90mm saw > very little use except when I was stalking deer along a roadside on > Vancouver Island. After seven weeks with the M6HM TTL I must confess I > really like the TTL flash, although 1/50 as sync speed is limiting in > certain sunny conditions, especially if you are used to 1/250. Still, by > balancing LEDs with the flash, very effective fill flash can be obtained. > The other thing that did not bother me about the M6TTL was the direction of > the shutter speed dial - I just got used to it and now like that the LED > points in the direction you should turn the dial. I think I will have > trouble going back to my M6 classic. > On to my Leica story: while in Western Canada I had dinner with old German > friends and talk turned to Leicas. It turns out that on the birth date of > the wife of my host - October 3, 1933 - her father, a Doctor in Hanover - > went out and bought a Leica, together with a collapsible 5cm Elmar F3.5. > (#674XXX) My host went down into his basement and brought up a box of Leica > equipment, including the above camera (black paint - unscratched - serial > number 116XXX - a model III F according to Dennis Laney's book - but by the > serial number it should be chrome and it isn't?? another one of those > interesting Leica mysteries) with an as-new case and two other lenses - a > 3.5cm Summaron F3.5 (#1159XXX) and a 5cm Summar F2.0, (#286XXX) along with > a Vidom view finder and another rangefinder with prism in a separate > leather case. Unfortunately the Summaron and the Summar, having lived in > the damp basement for many years were cloudy with fungus but the Elmar was > quite clear, although the front element was scratched a bit. Also in the > box were a selection of Leica filters UV "fiola", yellow 1 "fiooc", Yellow > "figro", Yellow "fihel" and Green "fbxoo" all with original cases and an > Ising tripod. The camera is missing one circular front cover for the > rangefinder window, and as might be expected the rangefinder is quite dirty > and the slower shutter speeds are slow but the over all condition is near > mint - as is the camera case. It seems the Doctor used the camera to take > pictures of his daughter and her siblings and then when she grew up he gave > the camera to her - having bought it when she was born to pass on to her > when she could appreciate it. The camera survived the war - it was at the > Doctor's office when their house was bombed - and then was taken to New > York where it was used to take pictures of the daughter's young family. > Finally it was taken to Toronto and hence to Western Canada where it wasn't > used much any more. I think it remarkable that such a complete history of a > camera can be traced and find it's cosmetic condition hard to believe (it > is as good as my nearly new M6HM TTL) - even though it does need to be CLAd > and the view finder window cover needs to be replaced (are there spare > parts for a 66 year old camera I wonder?) Finally, I promised my friends > that I would ask the LUG what would be a fair price for all this equipment > and what are the possibilities that the Summaron and the Summar could be > cleaned of their fungus? Welcome your thoughts everone, > Cheers > Howard Cummer.