Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B.D.: I have seen your photographs and therefore have some understanding of your approach to creating images...go for both the wides. With todays great films the extra stop of the 75mm will not add much to your abilities. I have both 75 and 90(2.8) and almost never use the 90 because they are so close in coverage. I have 35, 28 and 21 and use them all the time and covet the 24 and toy with idea of getting the 15mm. There is bigger difference in look of the wides than at the middle/long end of our M's. Off to Texas for several days. Steven Alexander > Suppose you already had a 35 1.4 and a 90 f.2...You could add either a 21 > ASPH and a 24ASPH....a 21 ASPH, or a 24ASPH, AND a 75 Summilux. You shoot > virutally all b&w...all available light...all people, much of it in tight > surroundings,....which would you chose and why? (I have used a 21 > extensively, love it, do get enormous use out of it, but find it a bit > extreme at times. I have owned a Nikon 24 and used it extensively, but found > at time it wasn't quite wide enough...Which means, do I go for the two > wides, and say to hell with the 75? Or do I add that fabulous 75 with it's > extra stop, and settle on one super wide?...Help Me Before The Insurance > Check Comes! > > B. D. > >