Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 08:43 AM 9/28/99 -0200, Greg Locke wrote: >NOPE! I spent a year doing research and cost analysis of purchasing a >digital camera for my business and came to the conclusion that unless it >will save or generate $20,000.00 per year it is not a financially sound >investment. Greg, You are coming to the same conclusion as many folks I know. It's not for the money savings that digital cameras are going to be used professionally for some time to come. The only reason to go digital is speed. The Nikon D1 is only now going to be able to change this as it starts to roll off the assembly line. Wonder how much it will cost to fix. For Kodak and Canon to lower the prices on the DC and DCS cameras, do they also lower the price of the repairs? I doubt it. Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch Your E-Mail has been returned due to insufficient voltage