Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is the best suggestion I've seen to date. It seems that many of the people who are calling for censorship of this list in one form or another have not been on it long enough to appreciate the cyclical nature of the activity here. Every six months or so (like clockwork) some self-hating Leica owner shows up and thinks he's brilliant because he can trash talk about a camera he paid $3,000 for. There is a big uproar, then people get tired of being baited by his inane postings and stop replying. Once the source of attention dries up, he either shuts up or moves on. The list is essentially self-regulating, thus no "editing" by a third party is required. Two good rules of thumb for both mailing lists and Usenet (or even e-mail to some extent) are a) Don't respond to a troll (i.e. someone who writes bait posts in an interest area): you aren't going to convince them they're wrong, and experience suggests they aren't listening anyway and b) If a post really gets you riled up, go ahead and write a reply, but leave it in your outbox for 30 minutes until you cool down before actually sending it. It keeps some unneccessarily ugly things from getting said, and can take an argument down a notch when things get hot. - -------------------------- > > Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 19:57:08 -0700 > From: Aubin <aubin@aa.net> > Subject: [none] > > If you don't like what Anthony posted, ignore it. Don't answer it, don't > feel its your duty > to somehow preserve the purity of the LUG, or the universal rightness of > the posted > material. Its not your responsibility, and its not your duty. Just flippin > ignore it! >