Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Your query concerning the use of the LTM on enlargers to the Large Format List was reproduced on the Leica Users' group. Allow me to respond. Oscar Barnack, the chief designer for Leitz, worked with Hugo Meyer and an English camera shop to develop the Leica thread-mount. This eventually ended up as 39mm by 26tpi, the latter being, I understand, in Whitworth thread though, fortunately, I've never had to cut such a thread on my Unimat. The reasons for this specific selection are now unknown: I have spoken with several folks who knew Barnack personally, but none ever asked him this question, and, in any event, it does not seem to have been documented in the surviving Leitz/Leica records. The specific thread and pitch were determined in 1931 and were patented. This patent expired in 1951, though the Orientals and Soviets pirated the mount before this date. (Canon and FED both got it wrong, at first, but, eventually, came to understand that Barnack MEANT 26tpi and not some metric equivalent. Hence, early FED gear from the '30's, and Canon stuff from the '40's, will occasionally bind in a true LTM.) Leitz marketed enlargers which used this thread to allow the use of the solid 3.5/3.5cm Leitz Tessar taking lens as an enlarging lens. This began in the early 1930's. By the middle years of that decade, Zeiss Ikon was adapting their range of enlargers to allow this practice. After the end of the Second World War, Leitz marketed adapters which allowed a swathe of bayonet-mounted lenses to be used on their enlargers. The basic answer is that Leitz used the LTM on their enlargers to allow taking lenses to be used as enlarging lenses. I hope this answers your query. If not, ask on! Marc msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!