Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Based strictly on what's been reported on the LUG the last couple of days, and what's to be seen on the untranslated Konica web pages, I'm looking forward to this new Hexar. It will be interesting to see how practical fast Leica lenses will be with the .6x magnification viewfinder. However, should a Summilux (or the 50 mm f/1.5 Cosina/Voigtlander lens) prove useable, and should that smaller magnification allow for a higher eyepoint and for an eyeglass wearer such as myself to view the entire frame, it will be a huge attraction to me. To me, the 28 mm framelines of the .72 magnification M6 are invisible. Even the 35 mm framelines in that model are at the limit of what I can see in a glance. In this regard I've always found the Contax G cameras much more useable. Far, far preferable (to me, anyway) to see the whole frame at a reduced magnification than to not be capable of telling what a photo will include at a larger size. And if an eyeglass wearer will be able to see the entire frame, beyond frame lines, and use that with a 24 mm lens sans separate viewfinder, that, for me, would be a dream come true. Frankly, I don't see the Konica as an M6 killer. As a former Contax G owner, I see it having the potential of doing more harm to the sales of that system. However, if as has been repeatedly reported here, an M6 AE (or whatever it will be called) is imminent, Leica may indeed be facing problems. Assuming actual street prices of the Hexar will be lower than pricing posted so far, the Hexar could conceivably cost substantially less than the M6 TTL. And presumably, a new M6 AE would be priced even higher than the current M6 TTL. No doubt, an M6 AE will sell to Leica's current client base, a base willing to pay whatever it takes for the highest quality available. But the current client base isn't enough for the company to sufficiently grow on. The Hexar offers what may be a lower priced alternative. The M6 has thrived for decades in part because it has no competition. Can an M6 AE thrive with competition? Perhaps, but I suspect not to the extent Leica needs it to. And by the way, did anyone else notice that the flash pictured on the C'dI page looks exactly like the Olympus S-20 flash (made by Metz)? Which is the same flash as the one offered for the Minilux Zoom. I suppose the Konica one, like the Minilux flash, has TTL circuitry added. It has the same power as the Leica SF-20 but is substantially smaller. And the Olympus version comes with a diffuser covering the angle of a 24 mm lens. Larry