Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Aaron Ruby wrote: ><Snip> The problem there is that it might unnecessarily limit > maximum magnification on my Saunders 670VCCE relative to the 80mm lens. > On the other hand, I hate dealing with unnecessary light fall off due to > poor coverage. > > I just bought a used Fuji GW670III and I'm dying to be able to print > negs from it! Any recommendations would be more than welcome. If you ><Snip> I forgot about the 105. The Nikon is a classic which is much better than thier 80. It is designed to cover 6x9 so with 6x7 you've got some leeway. But I'd still go for the 135. I'm talking numbers not brands. The numbers (focal lengths) would usually match up in terms of coverage brand to brand unless you've got yourself into some super high end wide angle APO thing. I don't like the wide angles (I know Leica is famous for them I'm sorry) they make you scrunch down and then your edges are never going to be as sharp and light fall off is always a question. Mark Rabiner I love printing 6x9 full frame black border and telling people it's 35mm and I have a secret film/developer formula. :)