Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Devil's advocate
From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 19:43:07 +0200
 
From: Mike Johnston <michaeljohnston@ameritech.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 1999 12:43
Subject: [Leica] Devil's advocate


> The biggest problem with the M6 is not that it is a bad
> camera (it's a great camera, and progress will not alter
> that fact), but that it has stood still for too long.

This statement seems to contradict itself.  The M6 is a great camera, and
progress will not alter its greatness--but it must not stand still?  Why can't
it remain the same if it is a great camera and is destined to remain so?  It's
either great, or it isn't.

  -- Anthony