Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Check out http://photometro.com/ralph.text.html, ("Interview with Ralph >Gibson by Bill Kouwenhoven"), where I found the following passage: > >"BK: So you use a pair of Leica M6's and four lenses., and over the years >you've gone from using the 50 at 28inches range and now the 90 and last >heard, you were using 135. You didn't show a lot of glass either and >generally the perspective is very, very fine with a lot of control and >depth of field. That is your signature style. > >RG: I would use an Instamatic if I felt it would enhance the work. I'm not >really dogmatically attached to this or that. I might decide to use a Leica >Rangefinder, once in a while with a 180 or something, or if I need a super >close-up, I use a single lens reflex. I have a thousand exercises I do with >a Leica which I consider to be the purest and simplest of all abstract >instruments, much the way a violin is a very simple instrument, but >mastering it is usually complex. You're really narrowing, no pun intended, >your range of choices when you use a 135. " > >Dan C. > > >At 10:58 PM 23-10-99 +0200, Dominique PELLISSIER wrote: >>> >>############### >>It's the first time I read Ralph Gibson uses a 90 MM 80 % of the time. >>I know quite well Gibson's work. He declared to have used a M with a 50 DR >>or with a 35. He never pointed out a 90, never > > >NO ARCHIVE ############# Thanks for the info. I'm very surprised and eager to see Gibson's pictures with a 135 ! It's a radical change of style. Dominique > > >