Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Fortunately for me, my prints are 20x24 Cibachrome prints. The film I use is Fuji MS 100/1000 shot at ASA 200. Jim At 09:15 PM 2/19/00 -0500, Timothy R. Kuntz wrote: >I don't know, Jim, for you to have admitted to using 'drugstore 4x6 prints' just might put you into the same league of Leica photographers as this "Eggleston" guy we've been hearing about. You used the term 'lenses' - - was that the plural of lens or of lense - we need to know! Thank you for having the courage to speak out - whether or not it be PC or not. >Tim K > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: <FIGLIO4CAP@aol.com> >To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2000 7:25 PM >Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: FS: 35 1.4 aspherical (1st ver) > > >In a message dated 2/19/00 1:42:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, jim@brick.org >writes: > ><< I may well be the > finest lens I have ever owned/used. And I have, and have had, a lot of > Leica and Zeiss lenses over the past 50 years. >> >Me,too and I agree with you. I didn't want to last year, but even simple >drugstore 4X6 prinyts show the differences. >Bob Figlio >