Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Re: Interesting SCAM (or is it?)
From: "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:02:11 -0700

The fellow sounds like what we used to call a "Yankee Trader" or "Sharp
Businessman"
down here in the South.
Dan (Honey! would y'all git me a fresh straw fer mah mint julep? Thisun's
all soppy!) Post

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Moore <moore@rscs.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 4:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Re: Interesting SCAM (or is it?)


>
> > What would you say if I borowed your camera for 30 days, raised cash
with
> > it from the pawnshop, made some big bucks with the proceeds, then
> redeemed
> > your camera and gave it back to you in the same condition?
>
> As long as you had followed my terms, I'd feel like you were
> a good businessman and I'd have nothing to complain about
> (yes, I would also feel a little surprised).
>
> If I don't want you doing that sort of thing, I could build it into
> the terms with one sentence: the return privilege applies only
> if the camera does not function as described.
>
> --Andrew
> NO ARCHIVE
>