Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Getting "past it" is one thing. Recognizing what was done as a terrifically sleazy scam is another. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Summicron1@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 1:47 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: [Leica] re: interesting scam you don't need a 10-page contract. I would think specifying that return can only be made if the camera is not as represented, or only for mechanical defect, would be sufficient. People don't buy Leicas on spec. And my final point still stands -- he agreed to the original deal, he got his camera back in the same condition he sent it, so ultimately he has no beef. Tell him to get past it, sell it again and be more careful. ctrentelman ogden In a message dated 4/18/0 12:04:56 AM, you wrote: >How much 'crap' should one have to protect ones self from for trying to be >honest? I don't believe one needs a 10 page contract if a little common >sense (and common decency) is applied, and this goes against any common >sense, and is certainly an abuse of the privilege offered by the seller. > >I guess common sense (and decency) is not so common... > >------------------------------