Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Konica on Leica
From: "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:00:44 -0700

What's scary is that, if Konica provided the test sample, wouldn't one
assume it was checked and that's as good as it gets?

Tom Schofield

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "John Collier" <jbcollier@home.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Konica on Leica


> If you read the review it is obvious (even to him) that the camera
> rangefinder is out of adjustment.
>
> John Collier
>
> > From: Jeff Spirer <jeff@spirer.com>
> >
> > At 03:36 PM 4/18/00 -0400, ARTHURWG@aol.com wrote:
> >> Note that the reviewer,  David Kilpatrtick, loved the 28 & 90.
> >
> > That doesn't mean he didn't get a bad sample of the 50.
> >
> > I'll be glad to post some photos, you can see for yourself.
> >
> >
> > Jeff Spirer
> > Photos: http://www.spirer.com
> > One People: http://www.onepeople.com/
> >
>
>