Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodak versus Fuji: is that the issue?
From: Mike Quinn <mlquinn@san.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 17:21:06 -0700

Erwin,

Very interesting. But why didn't you include Kodak E100s?

(My informal tests of E100s against Provira F showed Provira F to have much
finer grain, but as you noted for Kodachrome, E100s had much higher acutance
and better color reproduction.)

Erwin Puts wrote:

> When I did a series of tests with K25/64 and Fuji Velvia and
> Provia100F (disregarding the saturation issue here), I found that the
> graininess impression of all four films (when comparing homogeneous
> areas of equal density) was very low and any difference would be
> irrelevant for most photographic purposes with high quality lenses
> (Leica ) and 35mm film at large scale projection. At this level
> differences in graininess are most likely explained by slight
> differences in exposure and with all films every possible detail
> could be recorded.
> The K-films however recorded the same details with a better edge
> contrast and details were crisper and  delineated  with  engraving
> like edges. Provia 100F had a definitely softer look, but in all
> fairness had somewhat less detail definition, compared to Velvia and
> the K 25/64.