Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry, Deadone, but I don't buy. Different? Okay. Better? Nah.:-) B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Johnny Deadman Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 2:33 PM To: Leica Users digest Subject: [Leica] Nokton v. Summilux M : some real (Human Traffic) examples Not my promised rigorous test, but a new set of images from Human Traffic all shot with the Summilux-M 50mm. http://www.pinkheadedbug.com/humantraffic/portfolio_13/index.html The sweetness of this lens is (to me) clear in images 4 and 9. The bokeh is on display in image 5. And to compare, some (mainly) out-takes from the week before, all taken with the Nokton. Check out: http://www.pinkheadedbug.com/humantraffic/nokton/index.html As I went through these images I was struck by how sharp and transparent this lens is, but in the end it was the bokeh (and in particular the distant-field bokeh) that disappointed. You can see what I'm talking about in images 3 and 8. In both cases I don't like the way the out-of-focus face in teh background is rendered. Of course, the difference is hardly going to leap out at you on a jpeg, but it'll be interesting to see if anyone agrees/disagrees with my verdict. - -- Johnny Deadman photos: http://www.pinkheadedbug.com music: http://www.jukebox.demon.co.uk