Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Nokton v. Summilux M : some real (Human Traffic) examples
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 14:49:36 -0400

Sorry, Deadone, but I don't buy. Different? Okay. Better? Nah.:-)
B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Johnny
Deadman
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 2:33 PM
To: Leica Users digest
Subject: [Leica] Nokton v. Summilux M : some real (Human Traffic)
examples


Not my promised rigorous test, but a new set of images from Human Traffic
all shot with the Summilux-M 50mm.

    http://www.pinkheadedbug.com/humantraffic/portfolio_13/index.html

The sweetness of this lens is (to me) clear in images 4 and 9. The bokeh is
on display in image 5.

And to compare, some (mainly) out-takes from the week before, all taken with
the Nokton. Check out:

    http://www.pinkheadedbug.com/humantraffic/nokton/index.html

As I went through these images I was struck by how sharp and transparent
this lens is, but in the end it was the bokeh (and in particular the
distant-field bokeh) that disappointed. You can see what I'm talking about
in images 3 and 8. In both cases I don't like the way the out-of-focus face
in teh background is rendered.

Of course, the difference is hardly going to leap out at you on a jpeg, but
it'll be interesting to see if anyone agrees/disagrees with my verdict.

- --
Johnny Deadman

photos:      http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
music:       http://www.jukebox.demon.co.uk