Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Guy, I really appreciate your thoughts. - --- Guy Bennett <guybnt@idt.net> wrote: > >I'm returning to photography after approx. 15 > years, > >and am taking a Black and White college class this > >fall. I'm fortunate to have been able to get an M6 > and > >I am wondering what a good all-purpose starter > lense > >would be. I really like the compactness of the 50 > >f/2.8 Elmar, but was wondering if I would be giving > up > >a lot compared to the 50mm f/2 Summmicron, > considering > >they are the basically the same price. Any feedback > >would be appreciated. > > > i honestly cannot see any reason why one would > choose the elmar 50 over the > summicron, except for compactness, i.e., if you > needed to slip the m6/50 in > and out of your pants pocket. and if compactness is > that important for you, > ditch your m6 and get a sm leica with an elmar > 50/3.5, which will slip into > your shirt pocket! > > as you mention, the price difference is minimal, so > for that little bit of > money you get a faster lens that is generally > recognized as one of the best > 50s around. > > i'd go for (and did, when i bought an m6) the > summicron. > > guy __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/