Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2000/05/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: RE: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative
From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 17:45:26 -0400
References: <003c01bfc67e$1319cc60$1974fdcc@BryanCaldwell>
At 10:05 PM 5/25/00 +0100, you wrote:
>Just out of interest, is the metering on an M6 accurate at such low light
>levels?
It is pretty accurate! The newer M6's have more accurate metering in low
light than the older ones. For an available darkness photo with the the
Noctilux wide open and 1600 film pushed to 3200 see:
http://main.nc.us/openstudio/tinamanley/Honduras/amilcar.htm
Leically,
Tina
Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com
Replies:
Reply from "Simon Lamb" <s_lamb@compuserve.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Reply from "Stephen A. Talesnick" <stephen@talesnick.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
In reply to:
Message from "Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)