Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] why are you posting this to the Lug???
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 17:19:00 -0400

Duane - As usual, you are being the Mr. Nice Guy of the LUG, because you are
a nice guy and can't help yourself..:-) But Kyle and Joe, abrasiveness
aside, have an excellent point, and that is that the folks on toycamera, who
I don't believe are little kids but rather are serious adults, are far more
interested in vision than they are in equipment - and the posted photos
demonstrate that. While there are some people on the LUG, both "amateur" and
"pro" who do wonderful work, there are an awful lot of people who produce
really mundane wasted film with literally tens of thousands of dollars worth
of equipment. I think that what Kyle and Joe are saying, and a number of us
have said in the past and will say again in the future, is, to paraphrase an
extremely abrasive political operative"

"It's the vision, stupid!"

If people spent 1/10th of the time they spend obsessing about the equipment
obsessing about what they are photographing and why, and actually taking
photographs, then the quality of their photos would improve immeasurably,
whether they use the King Tut Commemorative M6 Special, or a battered Holga.

But you're right, we need to be nicer to each other - he said, being his
usual nasty self..:-)

B. D.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Birkey,
> Duane
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 4:55 PM
> To: Leica Users (E-mail)
> Subject: [Leica] why are you posting this to the Lug???
>
>
> No offense Kyle and Joe, but what do you hope to accomplish by
> posting these
> messages to the LUG.  Are you telling some people on the LUG they are not
> worthy of owning a Leica nor a Noctilux?  Or do you hope to
> insult everyone
> who is not using Leicas to earn a living on this list or those
> who you think
> are being outshot by 12 year olds with toy cameras.  Or do you want to
> discourage people on the LUG from sharing photographs in the
> future for fear
> they will ridiculed?
>
> For many people on this list, Photography is a hobby and or a
> second passion
> and to them Leica is the best way to enjoy it as well as record
> personal and
> family memories. If the photography of people on the LUG doesn't meet your
> standards and you feel hindered by it enough to announce it publically on
> the LUG, perhaps you should find a group of people who share your feelings
> elsewhere.
>
> Either way, Let's be nice on the Lug.
>
> Duane Birkey
> HCJB World Radio
> Quito Ecuador
> Duane's Photographs of Ecuador
> http://duane_birkey.tripod.com
>
>
>
> 	From: "Kyle Cassidy" <cassidy@netaxs.com>
>
> >the www.toycamera.com group and the leica uses group, THEY KICK OUR ASSES
> every time. i'm absolutely serious,
> 		SNIP
> > go ahead and look at their galleries. then ask yourself why you spent
> $1400 on that m6.
> > we still need to come up with a credo for the LUG; this ain't it though.
> 		>kc
> Could it be that aside of a few LUG professionals and others who make good
> photos for a living or for profit, the rest of us are too concerned about
> the latest, sharpest, bokehest, and microcontrastiest instead of
> art, soul,
> and content?
>
> As an example I will name only one instance: Of all the sample
> photos shown
> by LUG members which were taken with a Noctilux, I cannot name a
> single one
> whose pictorial merit would justify the enormous expenses of such a lens.
>
> 		Joseph Codispoti
>
>

Replies: Reply from "Simon Lamb" <s_lamb@compuserve.com> (Re: [Leica] why are you posting this to the Lug???)