Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]A big thank you for pointing out this wonderful site. A great source for photographic ideas. I unfortunately did not go to the site when "Tofu" (?) pointed it out but your truthful comparison of my meagre efforts with their amazing results got my attention! I appreciate the time you, Ted Grant, B.D. and others take from otherwise meaningful lives to encourage this deadbeat to get out and shoot. Cheers John Collier > From: Kyle Cassidy <cassidy@netaxs.com> > >> From: "Tofu" <topher@netvigator.com> >> from; http://www.toycamera.com/index.html >> Toy Camera Credo: >> To illuminate and rejuvenate, to inspire great visions of truth and > > [snip] > > aside from the "shoot from the heart, not the pocketbook" there are other > vast differences between the www.toycamera.com group and the leica uses > group, THEY KICK OUR ASSES every time. i'm absolutely serious, go ahead > and compare their site to ours. we should all be throwing our cameras in > the river and hiding our heads in shame. THESE are the 17 year olds with > half a clue who live down the block and take their $12 junkstore cameras > out and shoot their butts off every day. > > when sue agostini goes out and takes pictures of her kids with her > holga they look remarkably like great photos, any one of which i'd hang > on my wall, not like very sharp pictures of some kid i don't care about. > > michelle gienow's new years eve party shots are a hell of a lot better > than mine are. meg mulligan's nailpolish gallery shows a depth of > creativity rarely seen around here. then there are kim taylor's amazing > pro-quality shots.... > > go ahead and look at their galleries. then ask yourself why you spent > $1400 on that m6. > > it's brutally depressing. > > we still need to come up with a credo for the LUG; this ain't it though. > > kc >