Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2000/06/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Positive vs. Negative
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 07:53:33 +0200
References: <200006122106.OAA19032@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <017001bfd4bc$11446b60$a882e0d8@i928653> <001b01bfd4d4$71e12900$953d18d1@PACBELL.NET> <023001bfd4dd$616c1f40$a882e0d8@i928653> <024501bfd4df$19d13600$a882e0d8@i928653>
Joe,
Simple--nothing beats the glory of a well-exposed slide projected with a quality
projection lens. So that is why I shoot slides. And if I want a print, I can
have that too. It is much easier to get a print from a slide than to get a slide
from a negative.
Nathan
Joe Codispoti wrote:
> I have been wondering lately why some photographers, Jim included, expose
> chromes instead of negative film when (publishing aside) the final result is
> a print.
- --
Nathan Wajsman
Overijse, Belgium and Zurich, Switzerland
e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
General photo page: http://members.tripod.com/belgiangator
Belgium photo page: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman
Replies:
Reply from Rich Lahrson <tripspud@wenet.net> (Re: [Leica] Positive vs. Negative)
In reply to:
Message from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> ([Leica] Positive vs. Negative)