RE: [Leica] Re: it DOESN'T work well for leica!

["B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>]

Wellll....With all due respect to Tina and Ted, who might be the  LUG's two
biggest Noctocates and are among the  list's best shooter - there are many
many great photographers who often work successfully in very low level light
without benefit of a Noctilux....The name Salgado immediately springs to
mind..:-)


> -----Original Message----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palito-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Dan Cardish
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 8:28 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: it DOESN'T work well for leica!
>
>
> I often wonder if the images I've seen attributed to the Noctilux
> on Tina's
> site and elsewhere would not have been possible with either the
> 50 Summilux
> or perhaps a 35 Summilux.
>
> Dan C.
>
> At 05:18 AM 13-06-00 -0700, Brougham wrote:
> >"Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> wrote:
> >
> >> As an example I will name only one instance: Of all the sample photos
> >> shown by LUG members which were taken with a Noctilux, I cannot name
> >a
> >> single one whose pictorial merit would justify the enormous expenses
> >> of such a lens.
> >
> >Have you seen Tina's site?
> >
> >
>