Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Kasemann words
From: Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 09:24:55 -0700
References: <3952AFE9.C0AB1300@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <l03130300b5784fa41ba2@[207.253.163.250]> <4.1.20000622181255.01ed23f0@gateway.photoaccess.com> <002801bfdcba$e8291ee0$9c206420@kimmel> <3952F256.BCA66BFD@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <003401bfdcd3$d196e2c0$235848a6@kimmel>
 
At 11:27 PM 6/22/00 -0700, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>
>And they do show a warm linear Kasemann, Jim!
>
>Mark :-) Rabiner

Did I say something different?

Here's the sentence from my post:

>"As with a non Kasemann, you can get a warm version."

I think can read my rotten wrotten correctly to mean warm is available in
both Kasemann and non Kasemann... At least that's what the words meant when
I sent them into the either. :-)

Jim
In reply to: Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] One remarkable photo)
Message from Andre Jean Quintal <megamax@abacom.com> ([Leica] One remarkable photo)
Message from Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com> ([Leica] Re: One remarkable Kasemann photo)
Message from "Bud Cook" <budcook@attglobal.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: One remarkable Kasemann photo)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: One remarkable Kasemann photo)
Message from "Bud Cook" <budcook@attglobal.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: One remarkable Kasemann photo)