Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Incidentally,why are there so few women on the LUG? Seemsa sham e.
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:52:52 -0400

...If I was right about a spelling, Julian, it may be time for some sort of
national holiday....as my spelling is truly pathetic!:-)

B. D.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Julian
> Thomas
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 12:02 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Incidentally,why are there so few women on the LUG?
> Seemsa sham e.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 4:20 PM
> Subject: RE: [Leica] Incidentally,why are there so few women on the LUG?
> Seemsa sham e.
>
>
> > Or well healed boys...;-)
> >
> > B. D.
>
> Shouldn't that be well-heeled???? - no, you were right first time :-O
>
> Julian
>
>

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally,why are there so few women on the LUG? Seemsa sham e.)