Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Today I was in Solms and they showed me some prints from a very professiona photographer who works on Velvia and K64. Prints were made from scanned negatives and digitally printed with 152 lpmm and with an intelligent procedure of rasterization. The quality is beyond what you can get with Epson printers as a generic class. The print size was A4. They looked beautiful, sharp, saturated colours etc, whatever you would like. The eye ccould not ask for more and indeed, as I said in my previous post, the limit of the eye's resolving power has been reached. Now I used my 10 x loupe and I did not see ANY detail, only raster points, and so did the Leica people. I had with me some B&W prints at 30x40 cm and when I used the same loupe on tese images, any body saw detail, more information and more detail into the detail. NO raster points or whatever, just plain real detail. I do agree with anybody on this list that a good digital A4 at normal viewing distance will give the impression of exquisite detail, but it simply is not there. The eye can not resolve it as this distance, that is the limiting factor, If you need to see more detail, you have to enlarge, which he fil can handle and the digital print cannot. This level of recording ability may not be of any interest to most observers of Leica prints. To deny it is a different ball game. I would indeed challenge anybody on the list to use a Leica negative, scan it ar whatever resolution, print it digitally at whatever high end industrial printer to a format of 30x40 cm and compare it to a chemical print at the same size and look at it really close. Let alone go for a slide show at a hundred times enlargement. I agree that digital prints look convincing, and are in itself impressive. I also find them wanting in detail at a level any chemical print can exhibit. I am not against digital prints and I indeed have a digital darkroom. When you are used to look at fine detail and gradation at a 25 times enlargement factor, the digital process is still far beyond the analogue process. My point is not that I am not willing to accept the claims of digital excellence. I do. My point is that willing to express leica excellence is still beyond the capability of digitally generated prints. My challenge stands for the Boston LHSA meeting. Erwin