Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Do you think that standard coated filters are the equal of (or perhaps even > better than) multicoated filters? I honestly do not know. I would believe that under 'some' circumstances one will be better than the other, and I also believe it depends on what filters (make and model) you are comparing... I would guess some multi-coatings are better than others, as well as some single coatings are better than others. Whether a filter is better/worse also depends on your image circumstances...if your job is shooting illuminated light bulbs all day, then this is probably important to you. For the photography I do, it is pretty insignificant. > If so what tests have you done, or what pointers do you have to others' > tests? The only tests I've done is real life use, at this point. I shoot with Hasselblads and Leicas. I use both Hasselblad and Heliopan filters. The Heliopans are the single (double) coated. I have had very very few negatives come out with any flare/reflections, and I can not say if they (flare/reflections) would not have been there if I removed the filter or not. So far, the use of a UV filter has not cost me any shots, or income. > (http://www.schneideroptics.com/filters/filters.htm) I couldn't find the exact thing you were referring to, but I am still looking...BUT there was a great paper on "Optics for Digital Photography": http://www.schneideroptics.com/pressreleases/kina.htm that I am sure some on this list will be interested in. Austin