Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]"Dan Honemann" <ddh@home.com> wrote: > If you intentionally overexpose by a third of a stop by rating Tri-X > at 320, do you then under develop by the proportionate amount? Or do > you develop as normal and let the latitude of the film compensate for > the overexposure (hoping to bring out more details in shadows)? Run--don't walk--and beg/borrow/steal Ansel Adam's _The Negative_. You'll learn more than you ever wanted to know. :) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail – Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/