Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't want my filter to be 'less' quality. However I also don't see the need to purchase additional doodads that perform nothing. As a former manufacturing engineering manager I am well aware of how much marketing can drive engineering into designing and implementing features that add no value to the product. And then (if they are good) the sales department can come up with a sales campaign to convince buyers that you just have to have it. And the above paragraph, based upon subjective use of many different types and brands of filters, is my humble opinion on multicoating (and maybe just plain coating) of filters. - -----Original Message----- From: Mark Rabiner [mailto:mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 1:52 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica or B+W Filters "Bergman, Mark A." wrote: > > To set the record straight my original remark on multicoating being a fairly > new development applied to FILTERS. Multicoating has been done on lenses > since the early 50's. Simple lenses like the Elmar and Tessar were great > lenses because they had 4 elements (less surfaces) and were contrasty before > MC was invented. > Sure but why would you want your filter to be of lesser quality then your lens? Mark Rabiner