Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Personally, I think it is cool that Jim's daughter is learning skills to produce excellent negatives. Real silver on film stuff that we all love. Get yourself a great negative and it makes the printing process so much easier and more rewarding. No matter how you choose to print it. Seems to me Jim's beef ought to be more toward the digital point and shoot crowds who never even use a roll of film, much less ponder the exposure and processing control required to realize a vision of an image. I am going to get two more Leica-H cameras so I can have N-1, N, N+1 bodies! I do have a question for both the silver/gelatin and digital camps. Although I use a film scanner with relatively low resolution and density range (it's what we have at the office that's available for me to use), I have noticed that I can print decent tonal range images that I have found hopeless in the darkroom, mainly because the negative was way too thin. Has anyone else noticed this as well, or is this just a function of my lack of skill in the darkroom? Or are there times when the scanning processing will give you better print results than in a darkroom, no matter what your darkroom skills? Just curious what other people's experience has been. Bob Kramer - ----- Original Message ----- From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > > Excellent and painfully obvious point Doug, which some, in their blind > adherence to an ancient - and venerable process/technology - are > unfortunately unable to grasp - just as those who mastered the use of glass > plates were often unable to grasp the advantages/realities of film.