Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]<< Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 18:38:46 -0400 From: "M.E.Berube - GoodPhotos" <meb@goodphotos.com> Subject: Re: [Leica] leica announcements Message-ID: <4.2.2.20000801183440.00bead70@www.snapdragontech.com> References: At 06:00 PM 8/1/00 -0400, Photovilla@aol.com wrote: >2: Leica is going to re-badge the Fuji 4700 and call it the Digilux 4.3. The >4.3 is for 4.3 million pixels (yes, interpolated). They have a close up >thingy-magingy that they will soon introduce as well for it. Digicopy will >still be around too. Question: Is the Digicopy apparatus at all a quality method for digitizing chromes with the current Digilux model? I'm not expecting Drum Scan quality but as good as my local one hour shop would be nice. I would like to get a digicam to play with anyhow (and why not Leica at that price), but if I could use it to get some workable scans of the 100s of chromes I have in stock, It would be that much better a buy. Thanks in advance. Michael E. Berube>> It is a pretty good little scanner...but at this point I'd wait for the Digilux 4.3 as the extra pixels will make a BIG difference I believe. That is if you don't already own a Digilux Zoom... later, Rich/PVI