Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 13:35:57 -0700
References: <75.7d4e546.26bc3353@aol.com> <023e01bffe43$f7e4e3a0$140a640a@cusackknowles.com> <3.0.5.32.20000804161600.007b97d0@pop3.magicnet.net>

John Hicks wrote:
> 
> At 12:47 PM 8/4/00 -0700, you wrote:
> 
> >Hows my memory on this one?
> 
>   Bob Schwalberg and Bill Pierce wrote several articles about the use of
> Rodinal at dilutions around 1:75 with sodium sulfite added for TX. Worked
> well.
> 
> John Hicks

I own two 11x14 Bill Pierce prints and He is my all time fave photo writer and I
love his work so it could have been him who said not to do the 1:25 dilution.
As much as I respect both these guys I never could bring myself to put Sulfite
in my Rodinal.
I guess it makes me feel all important to disagree with the experts.
Now however Xtol at 1:3 gives a smoothed out Rodinal look. Sharp and fine grain both.
Putting Sulfite in Rodinal I don't think would give you both.
You'd get less grain but a loss of resolution to match.
Mark Rabiner

Replies: Reply from John Hicks <jbh@magicnet.net> (Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....)
Reply from "Patrick R. McKee" <prm@americom.net> ([Leica] Re: FS Friday)
In reply to: Message from Krechtz@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....)
Message from chucko@siteconnect.com (Chuck Albertson) (Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....)
Message from John Hicks <jbh@magicnet.net> (Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....)