Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....
From: "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 23:18:04 -0400
References: <31.87abb4e.26bb68c8@aol.com>

I subscribed to Pop Photo in the late '60's and early '70's.  I only kept a
handful of issues, most of them with Schwalburg articles in them.  In a '74
35mm special he was definately recommending D-76 at 1:1 although higher
dilutions like 1:3 were metioned for some purposes.  To tame contrast he
suggested D-76 followed by a soaking in plain water.

On the collapsable Summicron question an earlier article, I remember it was
called "Shifty Fifty", about 50 mm lenses described the first Summicron as
having great resolution but poor contrast.  He said something like you could
count the hairs on the cat but lose the cat.  I can dig it out if anyone is
interested.

By the way, I have a beater Summitar which is very loose collapsed but nice
and tight when locked up extended.  Its a nice lens stopped down a little.
Perhaps the play in the mount accentuates the softness wide open.  In any
case its a heck of a lot better than the Summar.

Mike Durling
KD4KWB
http://www.widomaker.com/~durling/

- ----- Original Message -----
From: <Krechtz@aol.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....


> By the way, I have seen hardly anything in print evaluating the
collapsible
> 50 Summitar.  It is generally described as better than the Summar,
especially
> in the factory coated version.  I enjoy using it, especially the warm,
altho
> natural color rendition.  A pleasant surprise, overall.
>
> Joe Sobel
>

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....)
In reply to: Message from Krechtz@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....)