Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Noctilux 50mm f1.4
From: "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:27:25 +0100
References: <LAW2-F198TvRVuQ6z6w00002367@hotmail.com>

Barry

The true value of the Noctilux is in being able to capture available light,
handheld images that would otherwise not be possible, or only possible with
very high speed film with the ensuing issues of grain etc.

Yes, the lens does interfere in the viewfinder, but not obscuring half of
it - that was dramatic licence on your part I think.  One test roll is not
enough to be able to live with the Noctilux.  Once you have used it for a
while, you learn to look through the area of interference in the viewfinder
and you can compose just as well as with any other lens.

Indeed is does vignette when wide open but so what, if it maens the
difference between getting the shot and missing it, give me the vignetting
any day.  I agree, an editor or publisher may not be happy with having to do
a lot of cropping - if so, don't use the Noctilux for those pictures.

The Noctilux is truly an amazing piece of lens design but has the
limitations that one would expect and which Irwin Putts very concisely
describes in his review of the lens.  There are many examples on the web of
images taken using the Noctilux and they are superb (some of Tina Manley's
images spring to mind such as the child in front of the candle).

If you need to work in low light, need good quality/low grain images and can
justify the expense then there is nothing much to challenge the Noctilux.
But please, one roll is hardly doing justice to the lens or your
capabilities with it.

Enjoy the excellent 75 though.

Simon

Amateur Images at http://www.sclamb.com

Barry Dinan wrote:

> - thanks to all who responded to my last query re parallax error using
24mm.
>   Being new to rangefinder I had never thought of parallax error in
relation
> to foreground obscuring background. -
>
> I had the Noctilux 50mm on trial and after shooting a test roll with this
> lens I returned it to the shop and bought something else (The 75mm
Summilux
> f1.4).
> The main reason I can't ever use this Noctilux lens is ridiculous - the
> things a bloody cuckoo!  It's too big for the M6.  When it's on the M6 and
> you look through the viewfinder it's all you can see, it really obscures
> half the finder!!
> So I certainly found that not being able to see what you're trying to
> photograph - A BIG PROBLEM.
> The dark vignetting in the corner of the shots was extremely bad and nine
> out of ten shots required much cropping.  This factor could be critical
for
> e.g. if sending original slides or negs to a magazine publisher who layout
> originals without cropping facilities, and so on.
> Of course composition through the viewfinder is affected by taking the
> vignetting into account.
> On the other hand I did get some fantastic reproduction on the slide film
> that I shot with the Noctilux.  The colours and tones as captured by the
> Noctilux in low, artificial lighting were remarkable.
> However, I would need to do more tests with it to say that the Noctilux
50mm
> f1 has unique and outstanding characteristics that outweigh its defects.
> You've really got to see it to disbelieve it.
> Leica certainly don't list any of these major problems with the lens in
> their glossy brochure - quite the opposite.  Even though they are trying
to
> sell, I think Leica should be more honest in their brochure about their
> products.  When surprised with problems like these I am now suspicious
about
> any Leica equipment that I am considering to buy.  Try before you buy.
> Don't get me wrong I do enjoy my M6 system.
> Regards,
> Barry Dinan
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>

In reply to: Message from "Barry Dinan" <hawkeyecreative@hotmail.com> ([Leica] Noctilux 50mm f1.4)