Re: [Leica] Optimal Portrait Lenses

[John Coan <jcoan@alumni.duke.edu>]

Well, the Contax N1 is going to be a fantastic camera from what I've
read.  I have a Contax 645 and it will have several of its features, and
can use the 645 lenses in full automatic-all mode with an adaptor.  I
also have an older Nikon 8008s and several lenses and appreciate its
features too. But even the latest Nikon bodies don't have all the
features the Contax will have.  I think the CZ lenses would also be
better than most of the Nikon lenses -- but there aren't as many
available.

Switching systems is a painful experience, from what I've heard.  But I
will be considering selling my Nikon stuff and going with the Contax N1
at some point.  Would be interested in what you finally decide to do!

Thomas Donovan wrote:
> 
> Lugmates,
> 
> I'm currently thinking about adding to my SLR gear, one of the
> following lenses; a.) Nikkor 85 f1.4. OR  b.) Contax 85 f1.4.
> 
> I like the focal lengths from 85mm through 100mm for my portrait
> work. I do currently own the Leica R 90 f2.8 & the R 100 apo f2.8.
> In addition, I've been working with a Nikon F100/85 f1.8 combo
> as well. I do like autofocus at times for my informal portrait work.
> 
> I will keep my Leica gear no matter what ;-)! Thus, it's a matter of
> getting either a Nikkor 85 f1.4 (replacing my 85 f1.8) OR a Contax
> N1/85 f1.4 combo by trading in my Nikon system.
> 
> I would appreciate comments that would elucidate any subtle
> differences beween my Leica glass ( 90f2.8 and/or the 100 apo
> f2.8) from  Leica users who have "used" these Contax & Nikkor
> 85 f1.4 lenses.
> 
> Please understand I'm aware that my quest contains irrational
> elements; i.e, two SLR systems with overlapping focal lengths.
> 
> However, given the "gap" in the Leica R system; i.e., no "fast"
> portrait lens ( 85-100, f1.4/f2 ); it's time to consider an alternative
> SLR system........with the added bonus of autofocus when needed ;-)!
> 
> All comments highly appreciated; it's decision time!
> 
> Tom D.
>