Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 9/7/00 12:05:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time, owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us writes: << Here's my list of reasons why take the Hexar RF over the Leica M. 1. better meter 2. automatic mode 3. motordrive that works 4. 1/125 flash sync 5. rangefinder than never flares out 6. easier loading 7. DX coding That's reason enough for me. My m4-p pines away at home. Sold my M-6. tom >> - -------------------------------- Tom, I think you miss the point about an M. I can sum it up in one word: Manual. The M puts you in control of your photography from the ground up. With the Hexar, whether you're aware of it or not, you've opted for a different technique. I'm not critical of those among us who want to go the high tech way in photography. I'll use an AF camera for certain types of work. But when it comes to art photography, it's the M. I even use the M as a field camera. I compensate for its manual nature by presetting everything on the camera. It's only when I'm not thinking fulltime that my thoughts turn to automation. But if I'm not thinking fulltime I shouldn't be doing photography. By analogy, you don't drive when you/ve had a few drinks. It's all about M's. Best, Bob