Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Chandos, I'll rise to answering this. It sucks of 'psuedo speak', something which sounds profound but is in fact merely a cleverly phrased set of superficial words. If the statement is analysed the b/s becomes apparent. Photographers do not 'invent' the past, nothing 'invents' the past, the statement is empty and futile in its nonsense. Facile in its preposterousness. The past is past, it can be recorded, not invented. Events can be staged or manipulated but this happens in the present, these events can be recorded withphotography but that doesn't mean they're invented. If you look to Stalinist Russia you'll recall that it was Pravda that recorded, one might be tempted to say 'rearranged', and came closest to 'inventing' the past. But mere photographers? By themselves? No. America more than perhaps any other country values its freedom of speech so highly that (I contend) it would be impossibile to 'invent' the past contrary to real events. She's trying to say something which isn't communicated well. If she were a better writer we would understand what it was. Alas, all I see is psycho-babble. Jem (who tried to read the book once but couldn't manage it to the end - this may speak more of me...) Kime - -----Original Message----- From: Chandos Michael Brown [SMTP:cmbrow@wm.edu] Sent: 08 September 2000 14:29 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: LUGPhoto Quotes To Brighten Your Day What, precisely, is objectionable about this passage? Chandos At 08:17 AM 9/8/2000 -0500, you wrote: > > In America the photographer is not simply the person who records the past, but the one who invents it. > > > Susan Sontag Chandos Michael Brown Assoc. Prof., History and American Studies College of William and Mary http://www.wm.edu/CAS/ASP/faculty/brown