Author index of
LUG archive
for Vol 19 (Jan 2001 - May 2001) page 1
This index contains 16280 posts.
[Topic index]
[Prev Page] [Next Page]
[Search]
- (11 Jan 2001-03:59 GMT) [Leica] Fisheye Adaption
"Michael E. Bérubé" <michael@ionospeed.com>
César Bernardo <cesar.photo@clix.pt>
Félix López de Maturana <fmaturana@inicia.es>
Göran Bjerklow <goran.bjerklow@lvn.se>
Hĺkan Dennersten <dennersten@netch.se>
Jason Vicinanza <jvicinanza@yahoo.co.uk>
Jeff Williams <jeffwill_nz@yahoo.fr>
McFadden Peter <leicausergroup@yahoo.co.uk>
MEBérubé <MEB@goodphotos.com>
Nathan Wajsman <belgiangator@yahoo.com>
=?UTF-8?B?UGF1bCBDaGVmdXJrYQ==?= <Paul_Chefurka@pmc-sierra.com>
A. H. Ongun <ahongun@ecsysinc.com>
A. Lal <akhil.lal@bcc.cuny.edu>
A.H.SCHMIDT <horsts@primus.com.au>
Adam Bridge <abridge@idea-processing.com>
Adi Soon <adisoon@pacific.net.sg>
Afterswift <Afterswift@aol.com>
Ai Buangsuwon <aideas@pasonline.com>
Ajit Shenoy <tvrshnoy@del3.vsnl.net.in>
Akhil Lal <akhil.lal@bcc.cuny.edu>
Al Edwards <alwards@yahoo.com>
Alan Hull <hull@telia.com>
Alan Magayne-Roshak <amr3@csd.uwm.edu>
Alastair Cowe <a.cowe@ucl.ac.uk>
Alastair Firkin <firkin@netconnect.com.au>
Alison M. Reynolds <areynold@ocean.otr.usm.edu>
allan burned <ab-lnc@u-picardie.fr>
Altaf Shaikh <bshaikh@nyc.rr.com>
Amanda Baker <amandabaker80@yahoo.ca>
Amilcar de Oliveira <amilcar@domain.com.br>
Anders Nygren <anygren@attglobal.net>
Anderson, Ferrel E <AndersonF@ria.army.mil>
Andrew Moore <dmm@bronze.lcs.mit.edu>
Andrew Nemeth <azn@nemeng.com>
Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net>
apbbeijing <apbbeijing@yahoo.com>
apbbeijing@yahoo.com <apbbeijing@yahoo.com>
AppleMac97 <AppleMac97@aol.com>
ara ayer <araayer@yahoo.com>
arbos <arbos@mac.com>
Arne Helme <Arne.Helme@stelvio.nl>
Arthur Elkon <aelkon@wi.rr.com>
Arthur Krick <krick@mistral.co.uk>
ARTHURWG <ARTHURWG@aol.com>
asparaco <asparaco@metafour.net>
Austin Burbridge <Austin.Burbridge@Alumni.Brown.edu>
Austin Franklin <austin@darkroom.com>
- (05 Jan 2001-14:57 GMT) RE: [Leica] Lens cleaning advice: thumbprint
- (06 Jan 2001-23:09 GMT) RE: [Leica] Comparison of Leica SLR and Contax SLR Systems
- (06 Jan 2001-23:12 GMT) RE: [Leica] Comparison of Leica SLR and Contax SLR Systems
- (07 Jan 2001-00:32 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: Comparison of Leica SLR and Contax SLR Systmes
- (07 Jan 2001-02:11 GMT) RE: [Leica] RE: Wedding cameras
- (07 Jan 2001-14:38 GMT) [Leica] which do you prefer, 24 or 36 exposure rolls?
- (07 Jan 2001-15:57 GMT) RE: [Leica] Comparison of Leica SLR and Contax SLR Systems
- (07 Jan 2001-16:35 GMT) RE: [Leica] which do you prefer, 24 or 36 exposure rolls?
- (07 Jan 2001-21:48 GMT) RE: [Leica] which do you prefer, 24 or 36 exposure rolls?
- (08 Jan 2001-04:08 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: which do you prefer, 24 or 36 exposure rolls?
- (08 Jan 2001-18:03 GMT) RE: [Leica] How can I stop my rabbit from chewing on the cables
- (08 Jan 2001-21:33 GMT) RE: [Leica] throw away that extra frame!
- (09 Jan 2001-02:40 GMT) [Leica] Leica vs Contax...lense shades...
- (10 Jan 2001-16:34 GMT) RE: rabbits are not rodents (was: Re: [Leica] How can I stop my rabbit from chewing on the cables)
- (10 Jan 2001-18:12 GMT) RE: rabbits are not rodents (was: Re: [Leica] How can I stop my rabbit from chewing on the cables)
- (11 Jan 2001-14:34 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT rolleiflex
- (11 Jan 2001-14:37 GMT) RE: [Leica] Stupid newbie question from someone who should know better ;)
- (11 Jan 2001-16:00 GMT) RE: [Leica] Stupid newbie question from someone who should knowbetter ;)
- (11 Jan 2001-17:21 GMT) RE: [Leica] Stupid newbie question from someone who should know better ;)
- (11 Jan 2001-18:00 GMT) RE: [Leica] Only in Canada? Pity
- (11 Jan 2001-22:09 GMT) RE: [Leica] RE: Re: rabbits & MB's
- (12 Jan 2001-15:28 GMT) RE: digital workflow (was: Re: Re:[Leica] The Joy of BD's Darkroom --- DG darkroom)
- (12 Jan 2001-18:01 GMT) RE: [Leica] RE: Jobo Processor
- (12 Jan 2001-18:41 GMT) RE: [Leica] 75 Summilux unboxed!
- (12 Jan 2001-21:12 GMT) RE: [Leica] RE: Jobo Processor
- (16 Jan 2001-21:47 GMT) RE: [Leica] digital v. film, 35mm v. MF v. LF, how many dpi, etc etc -- someinfo
- (17 Jan 2001-00:28 GMT) RE: [Leica] 75mm f1.4 Summilux-M & General use lenses
- (17 Jan 2001-15:54 GMT) RE: [Leica] R8 or Autofocus? AF for sure
- (17 Jan 2001-16:07 GMT) RE: [Leica] 75mm f1.4 Summilux-M
- (17 Jan 2001-16:15 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: 75mm f1.4 Summilux-M (ASPH)
- (18 Jan 2001-00:02 GMT) RE: [Leica] R8 or Autofocus? AF for sure
- (18 Jan 2001-02:48 GMT) RE: [Leica] R8 or Autofocus?
- (18 Jan 2001-18:15 GMT) RE: [Leica] R8 or Autofocus? AF for sure
- (18 Jan 2001-20:14 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: kids? leica? a stern reprimand from the PLUG
- (19 Jan 2001-15:06 GMT) RE: [Leica] R8 or Autofocus? AF for sure
- (19 Jan 2001-16:55 GMT) RE: [Leica] R8 or Autofocus? AF for sure
- (24 Jan 2001-18:05 GMT) RE: [Leica] One of those annoying "Which would youchoose"posts....
- (25 Jan 2001-15:05 GMT) RE: [Leica] Shudder-bug
- (25 Jan 2001-15:56 GMT) RE: [Leica] Shudder-bug
- (25 Jan 2001-16:04 GMT) RE: [Leica] Shudder-bug
- (25 Jan 2001-19:26 GMT) RE: [Leica] Shudder-bug
- (26 Jan 2001-01:19 GMT) RE: [Leica] future of trees
- (26 Jan 2001-15:14 GMT) RE: [Leica] future of trees
- (26 Jan 2001-16:38 GMT) RE: [Leica] future of trees
- (26 Jan 2001-16:42 GMT) RE: [Leica] dear god - do NOT photograph your child's birth!
- (28 Jan 2001-02:23 GMT) RE: [Leica] funerals ! :-(
- (29 Jan 2001-01:23 GMT) RE: [Leica] funerals ! :-(
- (30 Jan 2001-00:38 GMT) RE: [Leica] 24mm Leica-M
- (30 Jan 2001-00:49 GMT) RE: [Leica] @#&$$& Watermarks!!
- (30 Jan 2001-01:04 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: @#&$$& Watermarks!!
- (30 Jan 2001-01:07 GMT) RE: [Leica] @#&$$& Watermarks!!
- (30 Jan 2001-02:06 GMT) RE: [Leica] @#&$$& Watermarks!!
- (30 Jan 2001-03:20 GMT) RE: [Leica] @#&$$& Watermarks!!
- (30 Jan 2001-03:29 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: @#&$$& Watermarks!!
- (30 Jan 2001-03:31 GMT) RE: [Leica] @#&$$& Watermarks!!
- (30 Jan 2001-03:34 GMT) RE: [Leica] @#&$$& Watermarks!!
- (30 Jan 2001-03:42 GMT) RE: [Leica] @#&$$& Watermarks!!
- (30 Jan 2001-12:18 GMT) RE: [Leica] @#&$$& Watermarks!!
- (30 Jan 2001-12:24 GMT) RE: [Leica] RE: Re: @#&$$& Watermarks!!
- (30 Jan 2001-19:37 GMT) RE: [Leica] 50 mm f/1.4
- (01 Feb 2001-01:41 GMT) RE: [Leica] Bokeh link
- (01 Feb 2001-02:45 GMT) RE: [Leica] Bokeh link
- (01 Feb 2001-14:36 GMT) [Leica] star pattern in lights when stopped down...
- (01 Feb 2001-16:41 GMT) RE: [Leica] star pattern in lights when stopped down...
- (02 Feb 2001-15:37 GMT) RE: [Leica] Persecuted for using tripod in public
- (03 Feb 2001-12:31 GMT) RE: [Leica] Persecuted for using tripod in public
- (03 Feb 2001-21:25 GMT) RE: [Leica] New Arrival - 75mm Summilux-M
- (04 Feb 2001-01:21 GMT) RE: [Leica] New Arrival - 75mm Summilux-M
- (06 Feb 2001-21:07 GMT) RE: [Leica] how can the 75 Lux focus go bad?
- (06 Feb 2001-23:29 GMT) RE: [Leica] how can the 75 Lux focus go bad?
- (07 Feb 2001-01:38 GMT) RE: [Leica] how can the 75 Lux focus go bad?
- (07 Feb 2001-01:40 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: how can the 75 Lux focus go bad?
- (07 Feb 2001-02:08 GMT) RE: [Leica] how can the 75 Lux focus go bad?
- (07 Feb 2001-02:43 GMT) RE: [Leica] Leicas as weapons.
- (07 Feb 2001-03:17 GMT) RE: [Leica] RE: Re: how can the 75 Lux focus go bad?
- (07 Feb 2001-15:49 GMT) RE: Re: [Leica] how can the 75 Lux focus go bad?
- (07 Feb 2001-15:58 GMT) RE: [Leica] how can the 75 Lux focus go bad?
- (07 Feb 2001-15:59 GMT) RE: [Leica] how can the 75 Lux focus go bad?
- (07 Feb 2001-16:08 GMT) RE: [Leica] DOF DOESN'T EXIST! (was: how can the 75 Lux focusgo bad?)
- (07 Feb 2001-17:23 GMT) RE: Re: [Leica] how can the 75 Lux focus go bad?
- (08 Feb 2001-13:08 GMT) RE: [Leica] how can the 75 Lux focus go bad?
- (08 Feb 2001-14:59 GMT) RE: [Leica] how can the 75 Lux focus go bad? NOW - DOF
- (08 Feb 2001-15:13 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: DOF -Optical vs Apparent
- (08 Feb 2001-15:25 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: DOF, thanks Austin
- (08 Feb 2001-15:30 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: DOF
- (08 Feb 2001-17:31 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: DOF, thanks Austin
- (08 Feb 2001-17:52 GMT) RE: [Leica] how can the 75 Lux focus go bad? NOW - DOF
- (08 Feb 2001-19:02 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: DOF, thanks Austin
- (08 Feb 2001-20:40 GMT) RE: [Leica] can't catch me in a contradiction...
- (08 Feb 2001-20:47 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: DOF -Optical vs Apparent
- (08 Feb 2001-20:49 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: DOF -Optical vs Apparent
- (08 Feb 2001-23:20 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: DOF, thanks Austin
- (09 Feb 2001-01:29 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: DOF, thanks Austin
- (09 Feb 2001-01:32 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: DOF, thanks Austin
- (09 Feb 2001-01:54 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: DOF, thanks Austin
- (09 Feb 2001-03:00 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: DOF -Optical vs Apparent
- (09 Feb 2001-04:19 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: DOF, thanks Austin
- (10 Feb 2001-17:14 GMT) RE: [Leica] Depth of field summary with regard to the argument at hand
- (10 Feb 2001-21:28 GMT) RE: [Leica] Depth of field summary with regard to the argument at hand
- (11 Feb 2001-02:23 GMT) RE: [Leica] Depth of field summary with regard to the argument at hand
- (11 Feb 2001-12:23 GMT) RE: [Leica] the digital/film side by side...
- (11 Feb 2001-12:27 GMT) RE: [Leica] Depth of field summary with regard to the argument at hand
- (11 Feb 2001-15:54 GMT) RE: [Leica] focus inaccuracies: my test results
- (12 Feb 2001-00:21 GMT) RE: [Leica] focus inaccuracies: my test results
- (15 Feb 2001-02:13 GMT) RE: [Leica] ............
- (15 Feb 2001-03:20 GMT) RE: [Leica] WKs 7,8 Includes picture of new film camera fromFrance
- (15 Feb 2001-11:57 GMT) RE: [Leica] ............
- (15 Feb 2001-12:04 GMT) RE: [Leica] WKs 7,8 Includes picture of new film camera fromFrance
- (15 Feb 2001-12:24 GMT) RE: [Leica] LUGgers in Woburn
- (15 Feb 2001-14:03 GMT) RE: [Leica] WKs 7,8 Includes picture of new film camera fromFrance
- (15 Feb 2001-14:13 GMT) RE: [Leica]S16mm Explanation
- (15 Feb 2001-14:15 GMT) RE: [Leica] LUGgers in Woburn
- (15 Feb 2001-14:24 GMT) RE: [Leica] ............
- (15 Feb 2001-14:28 GMT) RE: [Leica] WKs 7,8 Includes picture of new film camera fromFrance
- (15 Feb 2001-18:40 GMT) RE: [Leica] Is Photography Real...
- (16 Feb 2001-03:07 GMT) RE: [Leica] WKs 7,8 Includes picture of new film camera fromFrance
- (16 Feb 2001-03:24 GMT) RE: [Leica] WKs 7,8 Includes picture of new film camera fromFrance
- (16 Feb 2001-14:22 GMT) RE: [Leica] WKs 7,8 Includes picture of new film camera fromFrance
- (16 Feb 2001-16:47 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: lens hoods
- (17 Feb 2001-17:16 GMT) RE: [Leica] Which Epson Printer?
- (18 Feb 2001-00:21 GMT) RE: [Leica] One way to get a 35-70 lens?
- (18 Feb 2001-05:10 GMT) RE: [Leica] [OT] photographic fraud and trickery
- (18 Feb 2001-15:05 GMT) RE: [Leica] One way to get a 35-70 lens?
- (18 Feb 2001-17:07 GMT) RE: [Leica] One way to get a 35-70 lens?
- (19 Feb 2001-18:15 GMT) RE: [Leica] can't shoot with 75mm
- (19 Feb 2001-19:25 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (19 Feb 2001-20:36 GMT) RE: [Leica] can't shoot with 75mm
- (19 Feb 2001-20:43 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (19 Feb 2001-21:28 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (19 Feb 2001-21:41 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (19 Feb 2001-22:17 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (19 Feb 2001-23:03 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF-110mm f2.0
- (19 Feb 2001-23:26 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (20 Feb 2001-01:20 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: OT MF RF
- (20 Feb 2001-01:26 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (20 Feb 2001-01:51 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (20 Feb 2001-01:52 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (20 Feb 2001-02:12 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: OT MF RF
- (20 Feb 2001-02:40 GMT) [Leica] RE:
- (20 Feb 2001-02:47 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF-110mm f2.0
- (20 Feb 2001-13:30 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (20 Feb 2001-13:36 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: Mamiya 7
- (20 Feb 2001-15:58 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF-110mm f2.0
- (20 Feb 2001-16:13 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (20 Feb 2001-16:20 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (20 Feb 2001-17:43 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (20 Feb 2001-17:50 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF-110mm f2.0
- (20 Feb 2001-18:33 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (20 Feb 2001-20:11 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: OT square format (was OT MF)
- (20 Feb 2001-21:36 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (21 Feb 2001-01:04 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: OT MF RF
- (21 Feb 2001-04:03 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (21 Feb 2001-04:14 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (21 Feb 2001-04:35 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT MF RF
- (21 Feb 2001-15:19 GMT) [Leica] focus shift due to filter?
- (21 Feb 2001-15:31 GMT) RE: Loco for Cocoa Puffs - Re: [Leica] loco for chrome?
- (21 Feb 2001-18:17 GMT) RE: [Leica] UV filters and focus shift
- (21 Feb 2001-18:24 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: focus shift due to filter?
- (21 Feb 2001-22:58 GMT) RE: [Leica] <OT> Darkroom testimonial <long>
- (21 Feb 2001-23:03 GMT) RE: [Leica] RE: Re: focus shift due to filter?
- (22 Feb 2001-00:37 GMT) RE: [Leica] RE: <OT> Darkroom testimonial <long>
- (22 Feb 2001-00:45 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: <OT> Darkroom testimonial <long>
- (22 Feb 2001-03:12 GMT) RE: [Leica] RE: once or sometimes
- (22 Feb 2001-19:04 GMT) RE: [Leica] looney for chrome?
- (22 Feb 2001-20:09 GMT) RE: [Leica] looney for chrome?
- (22 Feb 2001-20:30 GMT) RE: [Leica] looney for chrome?
- (22 Feb 2001-22:28 GMT) RE: [Leica] loony for chrome?
- (22 Feb 2001-22:35 GMT) RE: [Leica] Delta 400 vs Tmax 400
- (22 Feb 2001-22:47 GMT) FW: [Leica] loony for chrome?
- (22 Feb 2001-22:51 GMT) RE: [Leica] looney for chrome? -GOING OT
- (22 Feb 2001-23:07 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: Delta 400 vs Tmax 400
- (22 Feb 2001-23:38 GMT) RE: [Leica] loony for chrome?
- (22 Feb 2001-23:41 GMT) RE: [Leica] Delta 400 vs Tmax 400
- (23 Feb 2001-00:03 GMT) RE: [Leica] loony for chrome?
- (23 Feb 2001-01:12 GMT) RE: [Leica] OT: Hewes reels revisited
- (23 Feb 2001-01:13 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: Delta 400 vs Tmax 400
- (23 Feb 2001-01:16 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: XTOL (Yeah!)
- (23 Feb 2001-01:45 GMT) RE: [Leica] Re: Re: Delta 400 vs Tmax 400
[Topic index]
[Prev Page][Next Page]
[Home]
[Search]