Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jim >>Right on Dave... way to go! The difference may be a renewed appreciation of how real prints are made and what they look like. There's noting like the genuine article! And your new techniques surely helped.<< Thanks for the kind words. I spent yesterday evening scanning a landscape that I had earlier printed chemically. Worked with both neg and print. Used paper with a similar finish, and quadtone inks. I never could equal the chemical print. It had a depth that I couldn't duplicate. Surprisingly, it took less time to make a print in the darkroom than digitally. I believe both digital and darkroom printing have a place. I also like the variety of working with both. It's educational and even inspires creativity. Mark Rabiner recently made an interesting predicton at the coffee shop. He said that digital will draw more people into photography. Some of those people will also try darkroom printing. Thus there will be a resurgence in chemical as well. I hope so. There's a place for both. Just like there's a place for both b/w and color, rangefinders and slrs, etc. Dave