Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Any opinions, empirical evidence or anecdotal comments about the superiority >of either the 90 mm f/2 Summicron or the 90 mm f/2.8 Elmarit? Or is this >simply a case of six of one, $700 or so more dollars for a my aperture's >bigger than your aperture? >[snip] >Greg Rubenstein In the words of the immortal B.D. (and where the hell is he, BTW?): the Summicron is better at f/2. Guy N.B. FWIW, when I faced that decision, I opted for the Elmarit because the 90 focal length is not one I frequently use, and thus I couldn't justify the additional expense for the Summicron.