Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My idea of this very same difference was that <crons> were just _sharper_ than <Elmarits>. I read somewhere that <Leica is racing against itself>, so it may be just price diferences of lenses that display very similar (superior) performance under very similar circumstances (depending on its production year). Am I right? Martin >Seriously ? >I have understood that all 'Crons were better performers than Elmarits. >That's new to my records. >Every day I learn some thing new. > >thanks > >-- >Pablo Kolodny >www.pablokolodny.com > >> From: Doug Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> >> Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> Date: 5 Sep 2001 08:44:29 -0700 >> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> Subject: Re: [Leica] practical question - or should it be saved for Friday? >> >> Otherwise the Elmarit-R's optical qualities are superior to the Summicron-R