Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] NOCTILUX-M f/1/50 mm
From: Mike Gil <dtt2150@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:58:45 -0800 (PST)

Ted, 

Your logic is beyond reproach.  Another example would
be a weightlifter.  They just don't say one day "I'm
going to lift 500lbs over my head".  They work up to
it.  So I think, B.D. should start lifting weights,
then one day the Noct will feel like a Summicron. 

Mike

- --- Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> wrote:
> B.D. wrote:
> >>As Leica gear goes, the Noctilux is a backbreaker
> - and don't forget that
> one of the main things many users love about Leica M
> gear is its small size
> and easy portability.<<<
> 
> Now, now B.D. mon ami, :-)
> 
> If one is in the army carrying an 80 pound back pack
> it eventually becomes a
> nothing chore. Therefore, the Noctilux may appear a
> "backbreaker" at first
> handling but after carrying it for sometime it
> becomes a feather weight and
> I'd prefer it to the 80lb. backpack. ;-)
> 
> Does that make sense? ;-)
> ted
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ted Grant Photography Limited
> www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 6:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] NOCTILUX-M f/1/50 mm
> 
> 
> > Absolutely true Felix that Leica gear, including
> the Noxtilux, is
> > featherweight when compared to a Nikon or Canon
> kit. Of course I believe
> > that my F100 body, without the booster, is pretty
> close in weight to an
> > M body. But that aside, you are entirely correct.
> >
> > HOWEVER - knew that was coming, didn't you :-) ? -
> >
> > Best
> >
> > B. D.
> >
> > Félix López de Maturana wrote:
> >
> > >>unless you want a lens that won't cause you back
> problems;
> > >>
> > >
> > > I'll remember that next time when carrying my F5
> Nikon with AFS zoom
> 28-70
> > > mm f1:2,8 (anything like standard use zoom). I
> can't ensure you but I
> think
> > > the combo weights more then three kilograms. As
> a Nikon and  Canon user
> this
> > > commentary looks ridiculous to me...Even the
> standard Canon 50mm has
> more or
> > > less same size.
> > >
> > > Kind regards
> > >
> > > Félix
> > >
> > > PS: Nocti is  for sure a marvel of lens with
> some minor defects.
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, see
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] NOCTILUX-M f/1/50 mm)
Reply from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] NOCTILUX-M f/1/50 mm)
Reply from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> (Re: [Leica] NOCTILUX-M f/1/50 mm)